Legal Opinion

Cutter v. Cutter

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided December 4, 1882Published

Appeal from a judgment rendered at special term. The action was commenced on February 13, 1882, and was brought to dissolve a partnership, which plaintiff alleged existed between him and the defendant, for a receiver, and for an accounting. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court at special term, which is as follows:

1Opinion of the CourtArnoux, J.

About November 1, 1879, the parties hereto, with one Inslee A. Hopper, entered into a partnership, which continued until September 27, 1881, when it was dissolved by the death of said Hopper. In December, 1881, the surviving partners acquired the interest of said Hopper in said partnership and continued the business. After the purchase of Hopper’s interest differences arose between the parties hereto, and on or about December 17, 1881, they entered into an arbitration agreement, which provided that, in case they should not be able within the next ten days to agree upon the terms and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Becker v. . BoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Howard v. . SextonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Wood v. . TunnicliffNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Davy's Executors v. FawSupreme Court of the United States · 1812

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API