Legal Opinion

Crary v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 21, 1930No. Docket No. 18366Published

Deduction under section 403(a)(2), Revenue Act of 1921, for previously-taxed property should not be reduced by amounts deductible under subdivisions (1) and (3) merely because such items were paid out of previously-taxed property but did not exceed in amount the value of property not previously taxed. Hepburn's Estate,11 B.T.A. 1386, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT CRARY AND GIFFORD B. CRARY, AS EXECUTORS OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF LOUISE B. CRARY, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Crary v. Commissioner

Docket No. 18366.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

19 B.T.A. 634; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2358;

April 21, 1930, Promulgated

Deduction under section 403(a)(2), Revenue Act of 1921, for previously-taxed property should not be reduced by amounts deductible under subdivisions (1) and (3) merely because such items were paid out of previously-taxed property but did not exceed in amount the value of property not previously taxed.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seaboard Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. Crary v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API