Cudmore v. Director of the North Dakota Department of Transportation

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Craig Cudmore appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the North Dakota Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) revocation of his driving privileges. Cudmore argues the hearing officer erred in finding that he did not invoke his right to consult with counsel before submitting to a chemical test. We affirm.

I

[¶2] In March 2015, Cudmore’was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”) after his responses to the deputy’s requests-:to submit to a chemical blood test were deemed a refusal. Cud-more timely requested an administrative hearing.…