United States v. Weinberg
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
On Application for Review of Decisions of the Board of United States General Appraisers. For decisions below, see G. A. 5,781, T. D. 25,563, and G. A. 5,784, T. D. 25,566, which related to importations at the port of New York by F. W. Weinberg. These importations consisted of imitations or whole and half pearls, of which some were mounted on wire for purposes of manufacture, some were pierced and intended to be strung, and others were neither mounted nor pierced.
Read the full summary
On Application for Review of Decisions of the Board of United States General Appraisers. For decisions below, see G. A. 5,781, T. D. 25,563, and G. A. 5,784, T. D. 25,566, which related to importations at the port of New York by F. W. Weinberg. These importations consisted of imitations or whole and half pearls, of which some were mounted on wire for purposes of manufacture, some were pierced and intended to be strung, and others were neither mounted nor pierced. The kind last mentioned were classified as manufactures of paste, not specially provided for, under paragraph 112, Schedule B, § 1,…
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge;
The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed, on the authority of Lorsch v. U. S. (C. C.) 119 Fed. 476, and U. S. v. Morrison, 179 U. S. 456, 21 Sup. Ct. 195, 45 L. Ed. 275.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Lorsch v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913