Legal Opinion

Scheppegrell v. Barth

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1960No. 43945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Justice.

Plaintiff, Dr. Ceril S. Scheppegrell, instituted this suit against the defendant, William E. Barth, painting contractor, seeking the recovery of $5,820 as damages for the alleged breach of a painting contract entered into on or about June 8, 1956, predicated on the assertion that plaintiff ■derived no benefit from the defective work, and in addition suffered damages for family inconvenience, curtailment of the normal use of his residence, and that of unsightly household disorder as a consequence of the defective work.

Plaintiff alleges that under the terms and conditions of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. GauthierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Nalty v. NaltySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Olivier v. AbunzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. Home Services v. MarvinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Chain Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  2. Matherne v. BarnumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Kuhlman v. TalleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Rocquin v. SimmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Marine & Land Contractors, Inc. v. Marine Rental Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API