Legal Opinion

Ploger v. Bright

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 30, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Anna W. Ploger against Anna W. Bright. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a motion for a .new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff was for 22 years a member of the household of the defendant’s father. family were apparently of. *629moderate wealth, but kept no servant, and plaintiff did the work which would usually be performed by a servant in a wealthy family. The plaintiff was on terms of familiarity with the family, and during^ the lifetime of the defendant’s father she received no pay; but he provided her with board and gave her a present of $20 at Christmas. _ The defendant’s father always spoke of her as his daughter by his second .wife, although this was not true. After the death of the father, she…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. . HutchinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Ulrich v. . UlrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Davidson v. . Westchester Gas-Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Coale v. SuckertAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dey v. QuinnArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Peters v. AdamsOneida County Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API