Legal Opinion

People v. Hussain

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 2014No. C074397PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUARTE, J.

On April 29, 2013, a jury found defendant Alim Hussain guilty of grand theft of an automobile (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (d)(1)), 1 arising from an improper lien sale. The jury acquitted defendant of other charges arising from that sale, as well as the charge of operating a “chop shop.” The trial court placed defendant on five years of formal probation, including 120 days in the county jail as a condition thereof.

On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in failing to instruct sua sponte on claim of right as a defense (CALCRIM No. 1863), and that counsel was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. Mendoza TelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. SailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. (HC) Martinez v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. In re Y.G. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Anderson CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Clark CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API