Munday v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BARFIELD, Judge.
The convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. However, the imposition of costs is REVERSED because appellant was not given adequate notice and opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Williams v. State, 538 So.2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Reese v. State, 521 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The case is REMANDED to the trial court with directions to either strike the imposi*337tion of costs or to rehear this issue in accordance with Jenkins.
BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ„ concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Reese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Langston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989