Legal Opinion

Malcomson v. Wappoo Mills

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 1898PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case comes up upon the intervention of Mitsui & Co., claiming damages as against the Farmers! Mining Company for nonfulfillment of contract. On 14th October, 1897, the Farmers’ Mining Company agreed to sell to Mitsui & Co., who on the same day agreed to buy, about 2,000 tons dried Coosaw river phosphate rock, for shipment in December, 1897, or January, 1898, at $2.40 per long ton. Mitsui & Co. chartered a vessel to receive this rock. On the 18th day of October, 1897, the Farmers’ Mining Company was, by an order of this court, placed in the hands of a receiver, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. People v. Globe Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Klauber v. San Diego St.-Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kansas Union Life Ins. v. BurmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. South Memphis Land Co. v. McLean Hardwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. In re Inman & Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1909
  4. Western Drug Supply & Specialty Co. ex rel. Lowenstein v. Board of AdministrationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. In re the Receivership of D. Ross & Son, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API