Legal Opinion

Carnation Milk Products Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 21, 1929No. Docket No. 22495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Steknhagen :

After the denial by the Board of petitioner’s motion for judgment in Carnation Milk Products Co., 9 B. T. A. 95, the petitioner herein, being a Delaware corporation, filed a uew motion for judg;ment, because the legal effect of several more recent decisions of the Board was said to afford entirely new support for holding the deficiency to be barred by the statute of limitations and hence to justify a new motion on that ground. This motion was, at petitioner’s request, set down for hearing and no objection to the hearing *557or consideration of the new motion was made by…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Gordon C. Borchardt, Charles Oran MensikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. Eversole v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  3. Equitable Gas Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  4. Three G Trading Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  5. Carnation Milk Products Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API