Legal Opinion

Ferency v. Board of State Canvassers

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1993No. Docket 133979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the order of the Ingham Circuit Court that granted the defendant Board of State Canvassers’ motion for summary disposition, brought pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8). Defendant has cross appealed. We affirm.

On July 6, 1990, Citizens for Parents’ Rights submitted to defendant petition signatures to initiate legislation entitled "The Parental Rights Restoration Act.” On July 9, 1990, plaintiff requested that defendant issue a declaratory ruling pursuant to MCL 24.263; MSA 3.560(163) that the initiative petition could not be transmitted to the Legislature because the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leininger v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hamilton v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Automobile Club v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Citizens for Protection of Marriage v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. Wayne County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Coalition for a Safer Detroit v. Detroit City ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State of Michigan v. City Council for City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State of Michigan v. City Council for City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API