Legal Opinion
State v. Chaney
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 12, 1967No. 2 CA-CR 65PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
The defendant, Chaney, along with a co-defendant, Mayes, was convicted of two counts of burglary, second degree. The defendant, Chaney, brings this appeal raising numerous assertions of error.
The charges in this action were brought under A.R.S. § 13-302, subsec. A which defines a “burglary” as the entry into any building “ * * * with intent to commit grand or petty theft, or any felony * In this case, the charges revolve around entries into two retail stores, in the daytime, the allegation being that when the defendant so entered, it was with the intent to commit theft.
The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1960
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. KevilArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- People v. PoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.