Legal Opinion

State v. . Hardy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The exceptions and assignments of error by defendants as to the prior searches of defendants’ premises cannot be sustained.

In S. v. Murphy, 84 N. C., 742 (743-4), it is said: “It is a fundamental principle of law that evidence of one offense cannot be given in evidence against a defendant to prove that he was guilty of another. We have been unable to find any exception to this well established rule; except in those cases where evidence of independent offenses have been admitted to explain or illustrate the facts upon which certain indictments are founded, as where, in the investigation of an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. . MeyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. Perkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. . SimonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. State v. . JeffriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API