Legal Opinion
Carmell v. Parr
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1910No. Docket No. 49PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Ejectment by Gideon Carmell and another against Silas L. Parr and another. A judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiffs on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is an action of ejectment. The plaintiffs bring the case here by writ of error.
Prior to the 14th day of May, 1835, and on that day, Louis Campau was the owner of lot 5, section 4, of the original plat of the village of Grand Rapids, and on that day Louis Campau and his wife conveyed all of lot 5, except the north 65 feet thereof, by quitclaim deed, the provisions of which deed are as follows:
“This indenture made this fourteenth day of May in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred thirty-five, between Louis Campau and Sophia, his wife, of Kent, Michigan, of the first part, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Turner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- People v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McVicker v. KneelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1917