Legal Opinion

Bell v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 27, 1942No. Docket Nos. 105150, 105151Published

The entire consideration in cash and its equivalent paid to the respective petitioners by the remainderman, their son, for their life interests in parallel trusts they had previously created, held, taxable as ordinary income.

1Opinion of the Court

ESTATE OF F. S. BELL, DECEASED, LAIRD BELL, EXECUTOR, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

FRANCES L. BELL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Bell v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 105150, 105151.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

46 B.T.A. 484; 1942 BTA LEXIS 861;

February 27, 1942, Promulgated

The entire consideration in cash and its equivalent paid to the respective petitioners by the remainderman, their son, for their life interests in parallel trusts they had previously created, held, taxable as ordinary income.

William N. Haddad, Esq., for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942
  2. McLean v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
  3. Parshelsky v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API