Legal Opinion
United States v. Theodore Anthony Cienfuegos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2006No. 05-10201PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
The Government appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to order restitution for future lost income to a manslaughter victim’s estate pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(b)(2)(C). Because restitution for future lost income may be ordered under the MVRA so long as it is not based upon speculation, but is reasonably calculable, we reverse and remand to the district court to redetermine the amount of restitution to be awarded.
I
On May 24, 2003, Theodore Anthony Cienfuegos drove to an area on the San Carlos…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. GaudetSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. David WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SerawopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MorelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.