Legal Opinion

State v. Parenteau

Hamilton County Municipal Court

Decided May 24, 1990No. C-90-CRB-7139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMark P. Painter, J.

This matter was tried by the court on May 7, 1990, the defendant, Pamela L. Parenteau, having been charged by the Hamilton County Sheriff’s office with public indecency, in violation of R.C. 2907.09.

Defendant was part of a “lingerie fashion show” at a nightclub named “Scandals” in western Hamilton County. The charge arose from the modeling by defendant of a lace brassiere which was alleged by the officer to be “see-through,” in that the officer testified he could observe a nipple area through the lace fabric. Defendant was apprehended after she had retired to a back room to change her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State of Oregon v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. CrenshawHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ellwest Stereo Theatres, Inc. v. State ex rel. ParsonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ChoateUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. ArthurMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. People v. SantorelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API