Legal Opinion

Tally v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1922No. 24,043PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Douglas district court; Hitgh Means, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*392The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pohtek, J.:

Plaintiff sued for the conversion of exempt property; alleging that its value was $650. J. M. Palmer, one of several defendants, alleged in his answer, by way of cross-petition, that plaintiff was indebted to him in the sum of $1,113 and asked judgment against plaintiff for that amount. Issues were joined, there was a trial which resulted in a general verdict for defendants; but in answer to special questions the jury found that plaintiff owned the property, that its value was $310, and that defendant, J. M. Palmer, was entitled to recover…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Treat v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Continental Insurance v. DalySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Armstrong-Turner Millinery Co. v. RoundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of Brimson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Peoples State Bank & Trust Co. v. Sayler (In Re Sayler)District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  3. Bogardus v. SalterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Gutterman v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API