Legal Opinion

Esposito v. Isaac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff failed to satisfy the criteria for an extension of time to serve either upon good cause shown or in the interest of justice (see CPLR 306-b; Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 103-104 [2001]). As to good cause, plaintiff failed to demonstrate diligence in effecting service (see Leader at 105). The referee found that the process server “at best, was sloppy, and at worst, was untruthful.” And, having provided an incorrect address for defendant, plaintiff appears to have made insufficient efforts to locate the correct address.

*484As to the interest of justice standard, while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Okoh v. BunisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Esposito v. GaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  2. Esposito v. GaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. Esposito v. GaryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  4. Esposito v. IsaacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  5. Gillard v. CitigroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API