Legal Opinion

Schmalstig v. Taft

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Plaintiff, Charles Schmalstig, sued defendant, Charles P. Taft, for $55,555.55 and interest, claimed to be due for money had and received by defendant for his benefit, being his portion, as the owner of 100 shares, of the proceeds of a sale of 900 shares of stock of The Chicago ■National League Baseball Club.

Defendant in his answer set forth in considerable detail a history of the purchase, ownership and sale of the stock, and admitted that there was due from him to plaintiff the sum of $6,255.54, with interest, but denied that plaintiff was entitled to recover any greater sum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roush v. RoushIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Ellis v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Butte & B. Consol. Min. Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  4. Lathrop v. Central Iowa R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Moore v. LynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ogden Fire Co. No. 1 v. Upper Chichester TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Ogden Fire Co No 1 v. Upper Chichester TwpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Ogden Fire Co No 1 v. Upper Chichester TwpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API