Schmalstig v. Taft
Ohio Court of Appeals
Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Plaintiff, Charles Schmalstig, sued defendant, Charles P. Taft, for $55,555.55 and interest, claimed to be due for money had and received by defendant for his benefit, being his portion, as the owner of 100 shares, of the proceeds of a sale of 900 shares of stock of The Chicago ■National League Baseball Club.
Defendant in his answer set forth in considerable detail a history of the purchase, ownership and sale of the stock, and admitted that there was due from him to plaintiff the sum of $6,255.54, with interest, but denied that plaintiff was entitled to recover any greater sum…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roush v. RoushIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Ellis v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Butte & B. Consol. Min. Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Lathrop v. Central Iowa R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Moore v. LynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ogden Fire Co. No. 1 v. Upper Chichester TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Ogden Fire Co No 1 v. Upper Chichester TwpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Ogden Fire Co No 1 v. Upper Chichester TwpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007