Legal Opinion

Alexandria Refining Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1925No. 2083Published

1Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

CARVER, J.

In support of their application for a rehearing, defendant’s able counsel file two briefs, one on the facts and one on the law.

*472There are two very deliróte theories as to the facts. 1 That of the defendants is 'that after the ' train, consisting of a locomotive and :a tender, pushing a cattle car, had come to a halt within six or eight feet of the crossing, and while the' locomotive w'as still puffing and the bell ringing and while the brakeman, who had just previously looked at the crossing and found it clear, was going back to the switch to throw it, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Louisiana Western R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Blackburn v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  3. Castile v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. McGuire v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  5. Lampkin v. McCormickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API