Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Walden

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1982No. 53,481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Innes, J.:

Appellants Alice Walden and CACE Investment, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s decision denying them what they claim to be improperly garnished funds.

The facts which gave rise to this dispute are as follows: The plaintiffs, Robert V. Dailey and Amy K. Dailey, successfully sued the defendant, William H. Walden, Jr., on a promissory note. The judgment for plaintiffs was entered on September 3, 1980. Thereafter, the plaintiffs initiated several garnishments in an effort to satisfy the judgment.

Two of the garnishees were Melvin Herndon and Mary Herndon who were tenants at 6334…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Farmers State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Walnut Valley State Bank v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jemko, Inc. v. LiaghatNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Miller v. Clayco State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API