Aa-Professional Bail Bonding v. Deal
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Dillard, Judge.
In this matter, AA-Professional Bail Bonding (“AAPB”) appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion to set aside the forfeiture of a bond it issued on behalf of Anne Kisudila following her arrest for shoplifting. Specifically, AAPB contends that the trial court erred in finding that Kisudila’s entry into a pretrial diversion program did not release it from liability on the bond under a statute pertaining to that issue. For the reasons set forth infra, we affirm.
At the outset, we note that under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (3), a motion may be brought to set aside a judgment…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hollowell v. JoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Luangkhot v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- WRIGHT v. BROWN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Rudy Aguila v. Kennestone Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- WRIGHT v. BROWN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016