In re Smith
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL TURNOVER OF ESTATE PROPERTY
DANIEL P. COLLINS, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is the motion of William E. Pierce, the Chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”), to compel turnover of $88,979.37 in proceeds (“Proceeds”) the Debtors received from the postpetition sale of their Arizona homestead (“Turnover Motion”).1 In the Turnover Motion, the Trustee argues that, since the Debtors sold their homestead and have failed to reinvest the Proceeds in a new Arizona homestead within Arizona’s statutory reinvestment period, the homestead exemption *757they declared…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wolfe v. Jacobson (In Re Jacobson)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Foreclosure v. FarmingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020