Legal Opinion

Acevedo v. Syrian Protestant Church

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 28, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The mere absence of a registration statement is not a bar to plaintiff’s right to maintain an action for overcharges in rent. Irrespective of whether such a statement is filed, the maximum rent for housing accommodations, based upon the rent charged therefor on the ‘ ‘ freeze ’ ’ date, March 1, 1943, is to be determined as a question of fact (Burton v. Muolo, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 18, 1952, p. 247, col. 5, and cases there cited).

In the case at bar the record is not clear as to the rent charged by the defendant on the “ freeze ” date for the subject housing accommodation.

The judgment should be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lindstedt v. MondsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962
  2. Freidus v. MendezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956
  3. Steiner v. GladstoneAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API