Bonny & Baker v. Brashear
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Westers- Dis. APPEAL Prom the court op the fifth district for the parish of ST. MARY, THE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT PRESIDING. This is an action against the defendant as surety in a curator’s bond. The plaintiffs allege, the late Win. S. Barr was indebted to them $604, for the amount of his promissory note, executed and payable the 31st March, 1833, with 5 per cent, per annum interest thereon until paid.
Read the full summary
Westers- Dis. APPEAL Prom the court op the fifth district for the parish of ST. MARY, THE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT PRESIDING. This is an action against the defendant as surety in a curator’s bond. The plaintiffs allege, the late Win. S. Barr was indebted to them $604, for the amount of his promissory note, executed and payable the 31st March, 1833, with 5 per cent, per annum interest thereon until paid. That Barr died soon afterwards, and R. B. Brashear was appointed curator of his vacant estate, and gave bond for its faithful administration, with the defendant as security. They allege, that he…
1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.
This action is brought against the defendant as Surety on a bond, given by Robert B. Brashear, as curator of the vacant estate of ffm. S. Barr, bearing date the 30th of June, 1834. The plaintiffs, who seek to recover the amount of their claim against the succession, allege, that the said Robert B. Brashear has badly administered the said estate, and has paid to the creditors only a small portion of their claims ; that the same was solvent, and six or seven thousand dollars would have been remaining after the payment of all the debts, had it been properly managed ; that the curator has…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cougot v. FournierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843