Legal Opinion

Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 12, 1984No. 83 C 4506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Ryder Truck Lines (“Ryder”) sued Consolidated Rail Corp. (“Conrail”), Russ’s Motor Service, Inc., General Trailer Sales Corp. and Agri-Share Cooperative, Inc., seeking indemnity. Jurisdiction is asserted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1337. Presently before the Court is Conrail’s motion to dismiss Counts I and II. We shall treat Conrad’s motion as a motion for summary judgment. 1 For reasons set forth below, Conrail’s motion is granted.

Ryder arranged for the transportation of chocolate products from Nestle, the shipper, in Fulton, New York,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Typographical Union No. 23 v. Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Grand Opera Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  3. Louisiana & Western Railroad v. GardinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Federal Commerce & Navigation Co., Ltd. v. Calumet Harbor Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Westhemeco Ltd. v. New Hampshire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yamazen U.S.A., Inc. v. Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company and Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United Van Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1993
  3. Rio Grande Motor Way, Inc. v. Resort Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Gibson v. CENDYN Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API