Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bailey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 20, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an indictment charging that the defendant “ with intent to injure and defraud did utter and publish as *584true a certain forged instrument purporting to be a promissory note well knowing the same to- be forged.” The indictment contains two counts,- charging the same offense on two different dates. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty, and, before, the empanelling of the jury, filed a motion to quash “ for want of sufficient allegations in form and substance,” and because the indictment did not set out in either count “the instrument or instruments alleged to have been forged ” or “…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Commonwealth v. SnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. United States v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Commonwealth v. FarmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Commonwealth v. MassadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API