Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Kings, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 27th day of July, 1909.

1Per curiam

Mrs. Farnham received the United States bonds on February, 28, 1885, at §48,650. They were called and paid in 1908, presumably at par. Hence Mrs. Farnham held them for some twenty-three years, and during that time received from them in actual income two and thirteen-sixteenths per cent, or §1,125 per annum, to which she was entitled, and it was her duty to invest for purposes of the sinking fund from the nominal income one and two-sixteenths per cent, or $475 per annum. Hence her actual income from the bonds for the four years succeeding her husband’s death was $4,500, and there was due the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CarrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  2. In re the Estate of PrinceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. McFadden v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  4. In re the Estate of NordlingerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API