Houck v. American Eagle Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOoNNOR, J.
Tbe contention of tbe defendant tbat tbe evidence offered by tbe plaintiffs fails to sbow tbat plaintiffs, or either of them, bad an insurable interest in tbe bouse covered by tbe policy, cannot be sustained. Tbe evidence shows tbat plaintiffs owned an estate for tbe life of N. F. Houck in tbe land on which tbe bouse was located, and tbat they owned such estate as tenants in common. Tbe ownership by tbe plaintiffs of this estate gave them an insurable interest in tbe bouse. It has been held by this Court tbat a person owning only an equitable interest in property has an interest therein which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gerringer v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Aldridge v. Greensboro Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Batts v. . SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ingold v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Williams v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- King v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Mahler v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Hill v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.