Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Badgett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from Pulaski Chancery Court. Hon. J.. R. EakiN, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, S. J.:

This suit was brought in the Pulaski Chancery Court to the spring term, 1877, by O. K. Badgett against W. J. Mitchell and Eletcher & Barron.

The object of the suit was to obtain a decree against Mitchell for a balance of f 600, claimed as due for rent of land, and against Eletcher & Barron to compel them to account for the proceeds of certain cotton the produce of the land, alleged to have been received by them from Mitchell, and on which Bad-gett claimed to have had a lien for his rent.

The material allegations of the bill are : That O. K. Badgett, and one N. H. Badgett entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goulet v. . AsselerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Duke v. StricklandIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lewin v. Telluride Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Thornton v. FindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Cook v. CaveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Hawkins v. First National Bank, Crossett (In Re Bearhouse, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989
  5. Willard v. Monarch Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API