Legal Opinion

Giamo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 16, 1971No. 70-536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Chief Judge.

The appellant was charged by indictment and information filed pursuant thereto with the crime of bribery. He was tried before the court with jury and found guilty. He has appealed the judgment and sentence of five years in the state penitentiary to this court.

*117Appellant has presented seven points on appeal. The first challenges the sufficiency of the information because it was signed by a state’s attorney assigned to the 11th judicial circuit by executive order pursuant to F.S. § 27.14, F.S.A. This point has been decided by this court adversely to appellant’s position.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  3. Matera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Giamo v. PurdyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
  2. Giamo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Murchison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API