Sunset Hills Homeowners Ass'n v. Karel

I mast dissent, becaase, in my opinion, the complaint in this case does not state a canse of action. The rales for reviewing the exercise of a chancellor’s discretion do not come into play if, as a matter of law, the complaint itself is deficient.

In Malnick v. Rosenthal, 313 Ill App 249, this court said at pages 254, 295, 39 NE2d 767:

It is fundamental that to entitle a plaintiff to relief by way of temporary injunction, his complaint must allege facts which prima facie give him the right to the relief prayed for on a final hearing.

Since plaintiffs’ complaint did not make out a prima facie…