Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Committee for Educational Equality v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 1, 2009No. SC 89010Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMichael A. Wolff, Judge

In Lake Wobegon, “all the children are above average.”1 In Missouri, all the children in public schools will get an “adequate” education under the state’s revised school finance law. The children of the fictional Lake Wobegon all cannot be above average, as a matter of simple math, but one never should underestimate the power of belief.2 Adequacy, on the other hand, theoretically can be achieved for all, and the new school funding law sets a standard for adequacy of funding. Unfortunately, however, the school funding law’s math does not always work; even the modest goal of adequacy is beyond…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API