State v. Kunz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the trial of defendant in the district court for Brown county under the indictment set forth in the opinion, objection was interposed to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the facts alleged in the indictment did not constitute a public offense. The court, Webber, J., overruled the objection, and thereupon, on motion, certified the case to the supreme court for review.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The grand jury of the county of Brown returned into the district court of the county an indictment against the defendant, accusing him of the crime of taking indecent liberties with the person of a female child under the age of fourteen years. The indictment charged that at a time stated, and at a place within the county, the defendant did unlawfully and feloniously take indecent liberties with and on the person of a female child (naming her), who was then under the age of fourteen years, to wit, of the age of seven years, with intent to then and there carnally know and abuse her, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State v. JarvisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State v. TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. StuhrWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. MacMillanUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. WeigoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.