Legal Opinion

James Albert Barker, III v. Samuel A. Christensen, Amy Vanderhoef and Randy R. Koschnick

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 20, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00795Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JAMES ALBERT BARKER, III, Plaintiff, Case No. 26-cv-795-pp v. SAMUEL A. CHRISTENSEN, AMY VANDERHOEF and RANDY R. KOSCHNICK, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FILING FEE (DKT. NO. 2), DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DKT. NO. 3) AND STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE PENDING CONCLUSION OF PLAINTIFF'S STATE APPEALS On May 5, 2026, the plaintiff, who is representing himself, filed a complaint alleging that Wisconsin court employees had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Kugler v. HelfantSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API