Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Morial

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 9, 1997No. Civil Action 94-2508PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

FALLON, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants’ Mayor Marc H. Morial, the City of New Orleans, Thomas Dupaty, John Roussell, Vincent Sylvain, the Urban Homeowner’s Corporation of New Orleans, Thelma French, Renita Bivens and Glenis Scott’s motion for summary judgment in the above captioned matter. For the following reasons, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

The genesis of this litigation occurred six years ago. Some time in 1991, the plaintiffs, Thomas and Fiona Abrams, began occupying a historic New Orleans home known as “Treme Villa”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jimmy Blackburn v. Marshall City OfCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Bernice H. ShanbaumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. State Hospital for Criminal Insane v. Consolidated Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MurrayDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2010
  2. Trashawn Hughes v. Bouchon Properties LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API