Legal Opinion

123 S. Broad Street Corp. v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 88-4280PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*43MEMORANDUM

O’NEILL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation, owns the Fidelity Building located on South Broad Street in Philadelphia. Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, was managing agent for the Fidelity Building pursuant to a management agency agreement made by it with the owner. The sole defendant, Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., is a New York corporation that owns all of the stock of Cushman of Pennsylvania, and is the surety for Cushman of Pennsylvania’s performance of the terms of the management agreement. The law firm of Dilworth, Paxson,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Tick v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Downer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  4. FinanceAmerica Credit Corp. v. Kruse Classic Auction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Read v. Pennsylvania Co. Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cushman and Wakefield, Inc. v. BackosDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API