Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Hartman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 22, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Since the judgment was on the merits and not a nonsuit, a decision *607stating the facts which the trial court deemed essential was required. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Goldberg V. Bruns, Kimball & Co., 276 App. Div. 862.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Owens v. OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Williams v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Russ v. RussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956