Legal Opinion

United States v. Bruno

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided February 24, 2010No. 8:09-mj-00029PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

GARY L. SHARPE, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Asserting the public’s constitutional right of access, the Hearst Corporation (hereinafter Times Union) seeks to intervene and moves for disclosure of jury information in this high-profile criminal case. (Dkt. No. 185.) The court interprets the motion as seeking disclosure of the identities, addresses, and questionnaires of the twelve regular trial jurors, and an order directing court reporters to file unredacted transcripts of the voir dire. (See id.) The government and defendant Joseph L. Bruno opposed disclosure…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. EufrasioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PirkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
  2. United States v. YoungDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API