Hassan Farah v. Hertz Transporting, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtTrickey, J.
¶1 Hassan Farah and other plaintiffs sued Hertz Transporting, Inc., Matt Hoehne, and Todd Harris for employment discrimination. The jury returned a defense verdict. Farah moved for a new trial, which the court denied. On appeal, Farah argues that the trial court should have instructed the jury on pretext. We hold that this instruction would have been appropriate but was not necessary. Farah’s other claims do not require reversal. We affirm the trial court.
FACTS
¶2 Hassan Farah and 24 other Somali immigrants, who are practicing Muslims, worked as “shuttlers” for Hertz Transporting at…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farah v. Hertz Transp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
- Harbottle v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Aloncita Monroe, App/x-resp. v. City Of Seattle, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Stacie Cavner, Apps/x-resps v. Continental Motors Inc., Resp/x-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Susan Purnell-carlson v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019