Twombly v. Lord
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Trespass (piare clausum eb de bo?iis. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. Transferred from the September term, 1905, of the superior court by Chamberlin, J. The controversy was as to the location of the divisional line between the parties.
Read the full summary
Trespass (piare clausum eb de bo?iis. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. Transferred from the September term, 1905, of the superior court by Chamberlin, J. The controversy was as to the location of the divisional line between the parties. It was agreed that the line began at the obtuse angle of Lot 3 in the first division of lots in Middleton, at the intersection of the Hare road, so called, with the main road in Middleton, and thence running southerly by the first check line in the town, which line was the division line between Lots 1 and 3. The defendant offered in evidence what…
1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.
The sole ground upon which the plan offered by the defendant was excluded was that it contained “immaterial printed matter likely to mislead the jury.” The only suggestion made in support of this finding is that the plan was self-contradictory. It is said that the length of the side line of the town, found by the multiplication of the width of each lot as stated in the printed matter on the plan by the number of lots on the line, is much less than the length of the line as stated on the plan. Hence, it is argued, it is uncertain whether the width of the lots, which appears to have been a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Norris v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Ingerson v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
- Manchester Dairy System, Inc. v. HaywardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Marshall v. MorinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920