Legal Opinion

Cooper, Wells & Co. v. City of St. Joseph

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1925No. Docket No. 109PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

This is an action brought to recover protest in which judgment was rendered for a part of plaintiff’s claim and which judgment is reviewed by both parties. Berrien county was at the time the tax was levied operating under the county road system and its assessed valuation was $68,717,104. The board of supervisors authorized taxes to be levied upon the real and personal property of the county as follows:

“Item 15 — Berrien county Covert road........$219,325.69

tax....... 137,434.20

tax — road........... 68,717.10

Road No. 359................ 1,603.44

one-mill...... 68,717.10

county road bonds.......…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Gunther v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Town of Macon v. PattyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Longstreet v. County of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Detroit v. WeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Studier v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. LeRoux v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Atlas v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Kadzban v. City of GrandvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Sprik v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICH.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API