MacK v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman
Plaintiffs James and Sheila Mack brought suit against defendant Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd., alleging that James cut his foot in the swimming pool area of a cruise ship owned and operated by defendant. Plaintiffs alleged that defendant was liable for negligently maintaining its swimming pool area; that defendant was vicariously liable for the negligent medical treatment James received from defendant’s on-board physician; and that defendant was liable to Sheila for loss of consortium. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill. 2d R. 308), defendant now appeals the trial court’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patricia Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Walker v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Carnival Corp. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Leslie v. Carnival Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Brandt v. MillerCoors, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.