Legal Opinion
Buellesfeld v. Carpenter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1942No. 30583PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
F. J. Buellesfeld sued A. B. Carpenter .and Helen Carpenter in the district court of Pottawatomie county to recover judgment upon a promissory note executed by those defendants, and another not a party here.
The defendants filed separate but substantially identical amended answers wherein they alleged, among other things, the following:
“. . . further alleges and states that at the time of the execution and delivery of the note sued on, an oral agreement was made and entered into by and between the plaintiff and defendants wherein it was specifically understood and agreed by the said parties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Farmers' Bank of Roff v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Tovera v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Horton v. BirdsongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Perforating Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Jones v. Sageeyah Development, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Land v. LynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958