Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Wages

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1999No. S99A1171Published

1Opinion of the Court

523 S.E.2d 330 (1999)

271 Ga. 616

DOUGLAS et al.

v.

WAGES et al.

No. S99A1171.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

November 1, 1999.

Kicklighter & Persse, Claude M. Kicklighter, Jr., Robert L. Persse, Springfield, for appellant.

Cheek & Thompson, Ronald K. Thompson, Godlove & Carellas, William H. Godlove, Rincon, for appellee.

BENHAM, Chief Justice.

Appellants Ann and Michael Douglas own real property in the Satinwood subdivision in Guyton, Georgia. Appellees Douglas Wages, Elze Kennedy, and Samuel Bennett also own real property in the subdivision. In fact, the parties are the only families living in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Sears; Concurrence · Carley.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Medical Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Beauchamp v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Pittman v. Harbin Clinic Professional AssociationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Shoaf v. BlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Georgia Canoeing Ass'n v. HenrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API