Legal Opinion

Eiland v. Ferrell

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1997No. 95-SC-1058-DGPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

In an opinion which addressed the relationship between CR 53.06(2) and CR 52.03, the Court of Appeals held the timely filing of objections1 to a domestic relations commissioner’s report to be essential to preservation of issues for appedate review, notwithstand*715ing the trial court’s actual consideration of untimely filed objections. This Court granted discretionary review to determine the proper application of the rules and also to determine whether the provisions of CR 53.06(2) should be inflexibly applied or whether the trial court has discretion to depart from strict…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cherry v. CherryKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
  3. Fleming v. RifeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  4. Basham v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
  5. Haley v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pennington v. MarcumKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Vinson v. SorrellKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. B.C. v. B.T.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  4. Rapier v. PhilpotKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Shafizadeh v. ShafizadehCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API