Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Housing Authority of the City of Madison
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 29, 1972No. 160PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Two issues, and two issues only, are raised on this appeal. The first relates to the contractor’s claim to $12,120 for removal of peat and backfill with sand under certain footings in the construction project. The second involves the right of the contractor to interest on sums ordered paid in the judgment. Each will be taken up in turn.
Removal and backfill claim.
At construction site “C,” one of four covered by the contract, a construction problem was presented by the presence of peat soil under the footings of the proposed construction. This fact was known to the Housing Au thority and to its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Laycock v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Necedah Manufacturing Corp. v. Juneau CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- California Wine Asso. v. Wisconsin Liquor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Williams v. Rank & Son Buick, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Afram Export Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. Metallurgiki Halyps, S.A., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. v. Royal Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Olguin v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Fattore Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Sewerage Commission of the County of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Klug & Smith Co. v. SommerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.