Legal Opinion

In re Worcester Silk Mills Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 17, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THACHER, District Judge.

This is a proceeding under the United States Arbitration Act of February 12, 1925, c. 213, § 4, 43 Stat. 883, U. S. C. Title 9 (9 USCA § 4), in which the petitioner seeks to compel the respondent to submit to arbitration a dispute arising under a contract for the sale of 200 pieces of georgette. ' In May of this year a dispute arose between the parties concerning the merchantable quality of 80 pieces of merchandise delivered under the contract. The respondent claimed that the merchandise was not in accordance with the contract and that he was entitled to a credit by…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Buzas Baseball, Inc. v. Salt Lake Trappers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Minkoff v. Scranton Frocks, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. International Refugee Organization v. Republic S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API