Armstrong v. State

James Armstrong (“Armstrong”) appeals his sentence following the trial court’s determination that he violated the terms of his written plea agreement. Because we find that Armstrong did not violate the express terms of his plea agreement, we reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The State charged Armstrong and six co-defendants with armed trafficking in *1157amphetamines and conspiracy to commit armed trafficking in illegal drugs.1 Both charges carried a potential life sentence. Shortly after his arrest, Armstrong provided a forty-nine…